The following is part of an ongoing conversations with Finger Arts.

It has to do with them giving me some idea of the time's of the very high scores of games.

Can anyone help me?

Sudoku Scoring

You say that when you match a number, that points are
determined by the number matched times the multiplier. So If you are starting a game on the expert
level the multiplier is x156. If you immediately match a nine you receive 1404
points.

This scenario assumes the game starts with no numbers on the
board .

So, if you were to
place all 9 of the 9's before the multiplier reduced itself you would score
12636 points. 1404 x 9.

Clean board, you complete a column or line or a box with 1
thru 9 while the multiplier is at 156, you would score 7020 points. if you
complete all 9 columns or lines with their 1 thru 9, your total score would
63180. 9 x 7020.

If it were possible that each of the 81 spaces could hold a
9 and you filled them using the 156 multiplier, your total score would be 113724.
Each space worth 1404 x 81.

The above numbers would be the highest possible numbers to
score in an impossible best case scenario.
But they are lower than almost all actual scores. Particularly the
137872 score.

This scoring scenario is not possible. Some numbers are on the board when the game
starts, The clock is running and the multiplier is decreasing, no one solves
where each number goes immediately. You
might find a few numbers to place before you start looking for candidates, but
the clock is running. If you're playing
on an IPAD, even the most adept finger movement takes some time. So in your scoring explanation is there a

**hidden**reference to bonus points? That is more than the value of the number times the multiplier. If there are bonus points are the also points that reduced? A Penalty?
Your explanation of scoring with my questions:

We added points to each number

(

*does that mean that if I solved a 9, you added additional points to the 9 and then multiplied)*
and a multiplier which decreases
with time. So when you match a number you receive points multiplied by the
multiplier. So, for instances if you solve all 9's first, you'll receive more
points than solving all 1's first.

(

*does this mean that assuming the multiplier is decreasing, that by solving the highest numbers first, that your score will be higher because the decreasing multiplier will become smaller as you get to the lower numbers? Or there is a bonus added because you did it in a certain order?)**T*he same applies to each block. When you solve all numbers 1 - 9 in a block, then you'll receive more points than solving arbitrarily various numbers in various blocks.

*(Does this mean that you get bonus points for completing a block? Like when the column or line rolls over? Does that rolling over give you a bonus? )*

I consider myself to be pretty good at Sudoku. I usually complete a Expert level puzzle on Finger Arts Sudoku2 in around 12 - 15 minutes. Yet my scores are almost always between 70,000 and 80,000. My highest score so far is about 81,000. It would be great to know how to get the big scores seen in the OpenFeint leader board! There must be a trick to it (other than cheating).

ReplyDeleteI too always play the expert level. My highest has been 85,000.

ReplyDeleteI still can't figure out how the scoring is happening when a block gets completed. The additional score isn't even a multiple of the multiplier!

ReplyDeleteMy highest is 84851

I have played 575 games of which 547 'perfect'

ReplyDeletehigh score 87143 - only time over 85000

best time 4:12

Scoring is a mystery - - - a great game can get a mediocre score and a lousy game 80000+

701 games, 87,299 high score. Came here to find out how it works. It is a mystery to me.

ReplyDelete87895 you seem to get higher scores by completing the boxes as early as possible. Also, you seem to get higher scores if you have a consistent rhythm - not sitting there thinking too long. Instill do not understand how the scoring works - some crappy time score way above very fast times. My best time 3:58 - but that was not my high score. You also score high even utilizing the 3 x's judiciously. Good luck all.

ReplyDeletebest time for expert is 2:57 and best score is 87,547. I notice that when i solve for each number - getting all 9's, then all 8's, etc - I have best time and worst score. Slower times from solving each row or column one at a time - but best scores. Sometimes the row wins 5k points, sometimes 3k, then 6k - i think this game is not scientifically scored.

ReplyDeleteya i noticed that the fastest completion time doesn't bring you the highest score, my fastest one were around 4:00 but my highest score comes from the game completed at about 10mins....

ReplyDeleteGreat game !

ReplyDeleteI've played 429 games

high score 88,160

best time 3:06

still, scoring is a mystery for me

well, someone wrote a program to solve it, the computer calculates the result within 1 second, then just input the answer with our fingers which would take normally 2 mins, guess what? only 85000 points!

ReplyDeleteI still can not understand how these guys got such high scores, ==!

Does anyone know of a site where it has the fastest times? I know most go scores (which is not an exact science)

ReplyDeleteFlash: 1:00

Easy: 1:23

Medium: 1:36

Hard: 1:57

Expert: 1:45 (Yes faster than the Hard Level)

Scoring system a mystery to me too, I have done 88,086 on expert and it was done on a timing of 5:36. My fastest time is 3:46 and it was a 83,500odd. I wonder if there is any link to the order of numbers (for example if you fill them in in an ascending order or other such like). My other (wild) guess is that you get more points for solving it without any lucky clicks, in other words with 100% secure clicks rather than going for 50%-50%s and getting a bit lucky sometimes.

ReplyDeleteMy best score on expert was 86,200

ReplyDeleteThe I finally tried cheating as someone suggested, took picture, solved, keyed in in about 2 min. My score was 86,648. This was with no mistakes.

I don't understand how people can get scores greater then 100,000 ?

Best score: 86.864

ReplyDeletebest run : 7

best time: 4:48